
Over at The Daily Beast, you can read my latest feature, "Girls Gets Graphic," in which I write about Girls, viewer responses, graphic content, and why THAT scene from this week's episode was a watershed moment for the Lena Dunham comedy.
HBOās Girls has always been a lightning rod for critical reaction, whether it be allegations of nepotism, privilege, or racism. Itās impossible to imagine a week going by without someone, somewhere, having an adverse reaction to the Lena Dunham-created comedy.
And thatās okay: art is meant to trigger emotional responses. Iād far rather watch a television show that stirred up feelings within its viewersāthat challenged them to watch something complicated and often uncomfortableāthan a show whose main goal was simply to please the most people, across all demographic swaths, week after week.
Girls is the most definitely the former rather than the latter. Itās a show that revels in its own complexity, in the often-unlikable natures of its characters, in the comedy of the awkward that follows. This weekās episode (āOn All Foursā)āwritten by Lena Dunham and Jenni Konner and directed by Dunhamāexpectedly led to all sorts of responses from its viewers, many of which was of the outraged variety.
Joe Flint at the Los Angeles Times yesterday penned a reaction to this weekās episode of Girls, focusing in particular on the graphic sex scene between Adam (Adam Driver) and his new girlfriend, Natalia (Shiri Appleby), which was challenging to watch: after making her crawl to his bedroom on all fours, he proceeded to engage in some disconnected, rough sex with her and then finished himself off on her chest.
āBut Sunday's episode was graphic even for those fans used to seeing creator and star Lena Dunham's no-holds-barred approach to story-telling,ā wrote Flint. āThis was not a first for cable TV, or the movies. An episode of HBO's Sex and the City showed fluid but played it for laughs, as did a well-known scene featuring Cameron Diaz in the comedy There's Something About Mary.ā
āHowever, this time it was a jarring end to a violent and hard-to-watch scene,ā he continued. āEven theatrical movies with sexually explicit material and adult pay-per-view channels typically steer clear of such displays, especially if it's not for comic relief."
Flint is right in saying that this was not āa firstā for cable television. But he (and an HBO spokeswoman quoted in the story) seem to have a short memory, as HBOās short-lived drama Tell Me You Love Me featured an even more graphic scene involving āfluidsā that was most definitely not played for comic relief.
Continue reading at The Daily Beast...
Comments