Skip to main content

The Daily Beast: "Secrets of Lost Revealed on New DVD" (a.k.a. My Thoughts on "The New Man in Charge")

Today, Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment released both Lost: The Complete Collection and Lost: The Complete Sixth and Final Season on DVD and Blu-ray.

The box sets contain the latest--and possibly last--in-canon adventures of the Lost cast via the twelve-minute epilogue entitled "The New Man in Charge," which stars Michael Emerson, Jorge Garcia, and... Well, that would be telling.

Over at The Daily Beast, I discuss "Lost: The New Man in Charge" as well as my thoughts about the strength or weakness of the epilogue as a narrative outgrowth of the series in a piece entitled "Secrets of Lost Revealed on New DVD."

Plus, I check in with fellow television critics and writers Maureen Ryan (now of AOL Television), Entertainment Weekly's Jeff "Doc" Jensen, Time's James Poniewozik, and New York Magazine's Emily Nussbaum to see their reactions to the Lost epilogue, how it fits in with the contentious ending of the series itself, and its effects on the legacy of the series.

Head to the comments section to discuss your take on the epilogue and whether it gels with your need for answers or whether you feel that the creative team should have left well enough alone.

Lost: The Complete Sixth and Final Season DVD retails for $59.99 (or get it on Amazon for $37.99), while Lost: The Complete Collection has a suggested retail price of $229.99 (or $148.99 on Amazon).

Comments

Jon88 said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
HipHopAnonymous said…
WARNING! LOST spoilers below.

(I have to believe that's the last time anyone does that for a while...)

Apropos of the finale itself, my reaction to the epilogue (which I prefer to think of as a FLASH-AFTER rather than an actual alternate ending) was somewhat mixed.

In a lot of ways it illustrated the difficulty of balancing the need to withhold information versus offering so-called 'answers' to the show's mysteries. Personally I'm a lot less interested in answers than in closure, which are different things entirely. And I do wonder if Darlton and Co. intermittently confused the two as they got closer towards the finale. Answers can be blurted out, closure cannot.

In this respect I quite enjoyed the Walt scene because I thought it offered some much-needed closure to Walt's storyline, which was pretty clumsily shunted aside due to the actor's inconvenient tendency to keep, you know, aging in real time. Even though I could've inferred as much on my own, there was still something dramatically satisfying about seeing him invited back to the island, perhaps as a potential candidate, as it managed to rescue all those earlier Walt scenes from complete and utter irrelevance.

As for the Dharma video, perhaps the less said of this the better. Not only was it surprisingly poorly done, bordering on parody (er, did I say bordering?) but was there really anyone out there demanding answers regarding the polar bears, the cages or Room 23? Anyone capable of adding 2+2, that is? And the 'Hurley-bird' thing was never really a mystery, just plain random.

However I'm embarrassed to admit that I never made the connection between the Lamp Post station and the Dharma drops. In retrospect it does seem perfectly obvious... it is an automated tracking station after all. So I did appreciate having that one spelled out for me in big neon letters.

But I could've lived without it too. Again, not really closure there, just answers. Had they revealed this during the episode "316" when the Lamp Post was first introduced, it probably would've carried a lot more dramatic weight and felt a lot more meaningful than seeing it in this form. Which kind of begs the question of why they simply didn't do so at the time (or at least hint at it more strongly), given that there was nothing gained from withholding it?

In the end by biggest gripe with this final chapter was simply, who really cares about polar bears and cages when we still don't know anything more about Alvar Hanso? After all that teasing, he's really just some rich guy we never get to meet? Ever? Not even in a FLASH-AFTER?

Oh well, maybe they're saving it for the 10th Anniversary Box Set in 2014. Namaste and goodnight

Popular posts from this blog

Have a Burning Question for Team Darlton, Matthew Fox, Evangeline Lilly, or Michael Emerson?

Lost fans: you don't have to make your way to the island via Ajira Airways in order to ask a question of the creative team or the series' stars. Televisionary is taking questions from fans to put to Lost 's executive producers/showrunners Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse and stars Matthew Fox ("Jack Shephard"), Evangeline Lilly ("Kate Austen"), and Michael Emerson ("Benjamin Linus") for a series of on-camera interviews taking place this weekend. If you have a specific question for any of the above producers or actors from Lost , please leave it in the comments section below . I'll be accepting questions until midnight PT tonight and, while I can't promise I'll be able to ask any specific inquiry due to the brevity of these on-camera interviews, I am looking for some insightful and thought-provoking questions to add to the mix. So who knows: your burning question might get asked after all.

What's Done is Done: The Eternal Struggle Between Good and Evil on the Season Finale of "Lost"

Every story begins with thread. It's up to the storyteller to determine just how much they need to parcel out, what pattern they're making, and when to cut it short and tie it off. With last night's penultimate season finale of Lost ("The Incident, Parts One and Two"), written by Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse, we began to see the pattern that Lindelof and Cuse have been designing towards the last five seasons of this serpentine series. And it was only fitting that the two-hour finale, which pushes us on the road to the final season of Lost , should begin with thread, a loom, and a tapestry. Would Jack follow through on his plan to detonate the island and therefore reset their lives aboard Oceanic Flight 815 ? Why did Locke want to kill Jacob? What caused The Incident? What was in the box and just what lies in the shadow of the statue? We got the answers to these in a two-hour season finale that didn't quite pack the same emotional wallop of previous season

In Defense of Downton Abbey (Or, Don't Believe Everything You Read)

The proof of the pudding, as they say, is in the eating. Which means, if I can get on my soapbox for a minute, that in order to judge something, one ought to experience it first hand. One can't know how the pudding has turned out until one actually tastes it. I was asked last week--while I was on vacation with my wife--for an interview by a journalist from The Daily Mail, who got in touch to talk to me about PBS' upcoming launch of ITV's period drama Downton Abbey , which stars Hugh Bonneville, Dame Maggie Smith, Dan Stevens, Elizabeth McGovern, and a host of others. (It launches on Sunday evening as part of PBS' Masterpiece Classic ; my advance review of the first season can be read here , while my interview with Downton Abbey creator Julian Fellowes and stars Dan Stevens and Hugh Bonneville can be read here .) Normally, I would have refused, just based on the fact that I was traveling and wasn't working, but I love Downton Abbey and am so enchanted with the proj