Skip to main content

Still Hungry: Bravo's "Top Chef Watch What Happens Reunion" Leaves Me Wanting More

Perhaps because this season focused on the strengths of the competitors and one particular sibling rivalry rather than on any animosity between the contestants, there wasn't a hell of a lot of controversy for Andy Cohen to discuss. (Certainly no wigs were ripped off anyone's head on Top Chef this season.)

So last night's Top Chef reunion was a rather low-key affair (especially compared with the histrionics seen on Real Housewives get-togethers), with the only remote sparks of controversy being those emanating from Eli's cancer comment to Robin, Ash's feeling that Padma hated him, and, well, that was about it.

Hell, anyone hoping to learn who the fan favorite would be from Top Chef: Las Vegas still has to wait until tonight to find out as someone decided not to announce the fan favorite winner during the reunion special (a likely place to do so) but to wait until Andy Cohen's Thursday latenight talkfest to do so. (In other words: Grr. Though there's no doubt that either Kevin or Jennifer will take home the prize.)

An effort on the part of host Andy Cohen to make it seem as though the cheftestants had bullied Robin throughout the competition sort of fell flat. While I'm not sure why one of the chefs didn't just tell the overly gregarious Robin to shut up while she dithered on endlessly, I didn't think that their dislike of her was anything other than personality conflict. (Her constant talking would have gotten under my skin so I can sympathize.)

As for the cancer issue, Eli admitted that he hadn't apologized to Robin for making the comment (he hadn't seen much of her since her elimination) and that he had cracked under pressure and said something he shouldn't. But he did apologize on-air and that seemed to placate Robin. Was it a little too sharp? Sure. But if you're living and competing with someone, particularly someone who drives you up the wall, there are bound to be moments where you go too far with a blunt comment. Still, the hatchet seems to have been buried for now.

I did love that the chefs each seemed to think that Padma Lakshmi didn't like them. (Including, rather funnily, Tom Colicchio himself.) Having met and eaten with Padma, I can say that she is nothing but sweet and charming and both she and Gail Simmons have told me on separate occasions (which they reiterated last night) that their sole interaction with the contestants is via their food and what they see at judges' table. And I think that's really for the best at the end of the day. It's a culinary competition, not a dinner party, and your success in the season depends on the food that you present on each plate and the way you carry yourself in front of the judges.

All in all, last night's special provided a nice trip down memory lane for the Las Vegas crew (and another chance for Mama Voltaggio to plead the fifth when asked again which of her sons she was rooting for) but the special lacked the incisiveness of other Bravo reunions. As I said earlier, that could have been due to the lack of real animosity or bristling personalities (though Robin, Mike I., and Michael Voltaggio certainly weren't meek presences). But really, the reunion special left me hungry for more, an appetite that could have been sated perhaps by the reveal of the fan favorite prize winner. Hmmm...

Top Chef: Las Vegas Blooper Reel:



Top Chef Las Vegas Bonus Clip: The Brothers Voltaggio:



Top Chef Las Vegas Bonus Clip: The Chefs' Tattoos:



Top Chef Las Vegas Bonus Clip: Run-On Robin:



Top Chef Las Vegas Bonus Clip: Scandalous Behavior:



Top Chef will return in 2010.

Comments

AskRachel said…
So annoyed that they didn't reveal the fan favorite. What was up with that?

I thought it was interesting, though, that Michael V. applied first to be on Top Chef and then the producers recruited his brother.

Popular posts from this blog

Have a Burning Question for Team Darlton, Matthew Fox, Evangeline Lilly, or Michael Emerson?

Lost fans: you don't have to make your way to the island via Ajira Airways in order to ask a question of the creative team or the series' stars. Televisionary is taking questions from fans to put to Lost 's executive producers/showrunners Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse and stars Matthew Fox ("Jack Shephard"), Evangeline Lilly ("Kate Austen"), and Michael Emerson ("Benjamin Linus") for a series of on-camera interviews taking place this weekend. If you have a specific question for any of the above producers or actors from Lost , please leave it in the comments section below . I'll be accepting questions until midnight PT tonight and, while I can't promise I'll be able to ask any specific inquiry due to the brevity of these on-camera interviews, I am looking for some insightful and thought-provoking questions to add to the mix. So who knows: your burning question might get asked after all.

What's Done is Done: The Eternal Struggle Between Good and Evil on the Season Finale of "Lost"

Every story begins with thread. It's up to the storyteller to determine just how much they need to parcel out, what pattern they're making, and when to cut it short and tie it off. With last night's penultimate season finale of Lost ("The Incident, Parts One and Two"), written by Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse, we began to see the pattern that Lindelof and Cuse have been designing towards the last five seasons of this serpentine series. And it was only fitting that the two-hour finale, which pushes us on the road to the final season of Lost , should begin with thread, a loom, and a tapestry. Would Jack follow through on his plan to detonate the island and therefore reset their lives aboard Oceanic Flight 815 ? Why did Locke want to kill Jacob? What caused The Incident? What was in the box and just what lies in the shadow of the statue? We got the answers to these in a two-hour season finale that didn't quite pack the same emotional wallop of previous season

In Defense of Downton Abbey (Or, Don't Believe Everything You Read)

The proof of the pudding, as they say, is in the eating. Which means, if I can get on my soapbox for a minute, that in order to judge something, one ought to experience it first hand. One can't know how the pudding has turned out until one actually tastes it. I was asked last week--while I was on vacation with my wife--for an interview by a journalist from The Daily Mail, who got in touch to talk to me about PBS' upcoming launch of ITV's period drama Downton Abbey , which stars Hugh Bonneville, Dame Maggie Smith, Dan Stevens, Elizabeth McGovern, and a host of others. (It launches on Sunday evening as part of PBS' Masterpiece Classic ; my advance review of the first season can be read here , while my interview with Downton Abbey creator Julian Fellowes and stars Dan Stevens and Hugh Bonneville can be read here .) Normally, I would have refused, just based on the fact that I was traveling and wasn't working, but I love Downton Abbey and am so enchanted with the proj