Skip to main content

Car Trouble: Contestants Recycle Spare Parts on "Project Runway"

If there are two things that you can always depend on with Bravo's Project Runway, it's that there's bound to be drama (and tears) and that eventually there will be a challenge that is much more about product placement than actually tasking with designers with creating breathtaking work. Last season has it's Hershey's candy-inspired challenge; this season has the Saturn.

Yes, I know that product integration (or to quote the esteemed Jack Donaghy, "product intergortion") is here to stay and a vital part of bringing advertisers' messages to the audience in the age of fast-forward-capable TiVos and generic DVRs, but I hate when it's so blatantly obvious as it was during last night's episode of Project Runway ("Fashion That Drives You"). (For another example of OTT product integration, check out Vitamin Water's presence in the first three episodes of next season's Gossip Girl.)

In any event, there were a few designers who did rise to the challenge of creating a fashion-forward design out of materials to make a Saturn, while many of them missed the point entirely. It surely wasn't a surprise to anyone that both Stella and Keith would end up in the bottom two, likely joined by also-ran Blayne, whose continued presence in this competition is mind-boggling to me. Hell, I'd go so far as to use Suede's mot du jour and call it "wackadoodle."

I was super-impressed, however, with the amazing garment that Leanne pulled off. It was a unique silhouette, beautifully constructed, and flawlessly executed. I am glad that she filled her model Karalyn's knickers with muslin in order to give curves of the dress the volume necessary to pull off the look and fraying the bits of seatbelt to create a feminine border on the bodice was as unexpected as it was stunning. Leanne won this challenge hands down and it was about time that she stepped up and showed the judges what she is capable of. I don't like Rachel Zoe as far as I can throw her, but here she was right: Leanne's garment looked Paris catwalk-ready.

Once again, Korto offered up a stunning design, weaving the gold-colored seatbeats into a coat-dress that was elegant, fashionable, and did not for a split second look like it was made out of recycled seatbelts. Simply gorgeous, this was killer work.

And I thought that Jerell pulled off an extremely modern (almost futuristic) design with his bustier and skirt combo that showed some real vision, skill, and risk. The overall look was definitely enhanced by the makeup and hair styling of his model Nicole, which gave the entire design a glam dystopian feel. (Yes, I know that's a bit of an oxymoron, but live with it.)

Landing in the bottom was Blayne, of course, with his ill-fitting fringed Cinderella dress with glued-on pieces of glass. (Ick.) He was joined by Stella, whose vest and skirt combo seemed to confuse the judges, who said it looked disjointed. It did look disjoined, but it also looked poorly made to me, something that the judges didn't even bring up during critique, and showed a distinct lack of inspiration. For a challenge that had leatha on hand in the fistfuls, I am not sure why Stella didn't go her normal route and craft an edgy biker look.... even though the judges have said that they wanted innovation this time around. But Stella's garment wasn't at all innovative, so she might have been better off sticking to what she does best.

And then there was Keith, who seemed to transform into the consummate drama queen this week, shouting and picking fights with his model and cursing up a storm. Wow. I knew he'd be the one to the get the boot, especially once he told Michael Kors that his comment last week wasn't constructive and just spiteful. (Um, that's what critics do, Keith: they criticize.) Michael Kors was right; if you want to make it in the fashion industry, you have to be able to let those comments roll off your back. But Keith was stuck harping on the judges' dislike of his last design to focus on the task at hand and ended up turning in a garment that was falling apart (yes, the model DID sit down during hair and makeup) and looked so super-safe that it missed the entire point of the challenge, which was to be innovative and original. It was, instead, hopelessly boring and dull: a white tank top and a high-waisted belted skirt. Meh.

No surprise then that Keith would be the one to get auf'd in a storm of tears and recriminations.

Next week on Project Runway ("Double 0 Fashion"), the designers are given a challenge to create looks that are inspired by one of the fashion icons of the last decade... looks that are then to be judged by fashion visionary Diane von Furstenberg. And, yes, the contestants are shaking in their designer boots.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I didn't care for JErrell's too-short outfit. My favorite outfit by far (And the favorite of the friends I watch with) was Terri's, and she wasn't even in the top 3. I thought her pants fit the model as if she was born with them on, and I loved the intricacy of her top.

I am so glad what's-his-name is gone.
Unknown said…
Suede really needs to go. This is the second episode in a row where he has brought up a dead relative in an interview, choked up and blown air kisses to the sky. It's so calculated and insincere that I want to vomit.
Anonymous said…
Suede can blow air kisses up his you-know-what. They have become more annoying than Blayne's "licious" obsession.
Anonymous said…
Loved, loved, loved Leanne's design. Korto's jacket was beautiful too. I thought that the pants Terri made were incredible but I wasn't that impressed with the top.

I thought this was going to be a lame challenge (like the Hershey's one) but the designers created some really impressive garments and managed to make the challenge about them and their vision and not just an ad for Saturn.

Popular posts from this blog

Have a Burning Question for Team Darlton, Matthew Fox, Evangeline Lilly, or Michael Emerson?

Lost fans: you don't have to make your way to the island via Ajira Airways in order to ask a question of the creative team or the series' stars. Televisionary is taking questions from fans to put to Lost 's executive producers/showrunners Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse and stars Matthew Fox ("Jack Shephard"), Evangeline Lilly ("Kate Austen"), and Michael Emerson ("Benjamin Linus") for a series of on-camera interviews taking place this weekend. If you have a specific question for any of the above producers or actors from Lost , please leave it in the comments section below . I'll be accepting questions until midnight PT tonight and, while I can't promise I'll be able to ask any specific inquiry due to the brevity of these on-camera interviews, I am looking for some insightful and thought-provoking questions to add to the mix. So who knows: your burning question might get asked after all.

What's Done is Done: The Eternal Struggle Between Good and Evil on the Season Finale of "Lost"

Every story begins with thread. It's up to the storyteller to determine just how much they need to parcel out, what pattern they're making, and when to cut it short and tie it off. With last night's penultimate season finale of Lost ("The Incident, Parts One and Two"), written by Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse, we began to see the pattern that Lindelof and Cuse have been designing towards the last five seasons of this serpentine series. And it was only fitting that the two-hour finale, which pushes us on the road to the final season of Lost , should begin with thread, a loom, and a tapestry. Would Jack follow through on his plan to detonate the island and therefore reset their lives aboard Oceanic Flight 815 ? Why did Locke want to kill Jacob? What caused The Incident? What was in the box and just what lies in the shadow of the statue? We got the answers to these in a two-hour season finale that didn't quite pack the same emotional wallop of previous season

In Defense of Downton Abbey (Or, Don't Believe Everything You Read)

The proof of the pudding, as they say, is in the eating. Which means, if I can get on my soapbox for a minute, that in order to judge something, one ought to experience it first hand. One can't know how the pudding has turned out until one actually tastes it. I was asked last week--while I was on vacation with my wife--for an interview by a journalist from The Daily Mail, who got in touch to talk to me about PBS' upcoming launch of ITV's period drama Downton Abbey , which stars Hugh Bonneville, Dame Maggie Smith, Dan Stevens, Elizabeth McGovern, and a host of others. (It launches on Sunday evening as part of PBS' Masterpiece Classic ; my advance review of the first season can be read here , while my interview with Downton Abbey creator Julian Fellowes and stars Dan Stevens and Hugh Bonneville can be read here .) Normally, I would have refused, just based on the fact that I was traveling and wasn't working, but I love Downton Abbey and am so enchanted with the proj